Frictional really needs to release this on Xbox Live Arcade

[Champ721]

I just really want to see Frictional Games succeed and I don't see why they couldn't put this out on XBLA. They'd get a LOT more sales and exposure as so many people don't even know this game exists.

I also need an excuse to give them more of my money, dammit. I'd willingly buy the game a second time on my Xbox just because i want to support them.

[sparqz]

well I agree it would be lucrative for Frictional to be on XBLA its unlikely, I'm sure there are issues with them being such a small company, not to mention i belive they would have to give some profits to Microsoft for it. But also porting a game to Xbox can be expensive and if you've been following Frictional's Blog they really aren't flooded with money.

[hollowleviathan]

I am pretty sure XBLA requires that games for it have X-Box exclusive content, as well as being quite hostile to user-created content like the custom stories, basically requiring new content like that to be DLC with a price tag.

Plus how controller-friendly is that sharp turns and fiddly physics?

[Bythemark]

(10-09-2010 12:34 AM)hollowleviathan Wrote:  I am pretty sure XBLA requires that games for it have X-Box exclusive content, as well as being quite hostile to user-created content like the custom stories, basically requiring new content like that to be DLC with a price tag.

Plus how controller-friendly is that sharp turns and fiddly physics?

Controllers actually translate mouse movements better than they're given credit for. In fact, with today's analog sticks and the push-in ability, even rotating would be easier on console than with mouse. Amnesia isn't a twitch game like Quake, so the difference in accuracy won't be too bad (provided some help with rotating wheels and whatnot was included).

[Sexbad]

Perhaps a sort of auto-lock-on function that is provided by holding down a button. You can press it and it focuses on whatever item you have selected in a certain range. But no, the control stick is not good for first person games.

[Deu sex]

(10-09-2010 06:13 AM)Lee Wrote:  Perhaps a sort of auto-lock-on function that is provided by holding down a button. You can press it and it focuses on whatever item you have selected in a certain range. But no, the control stick is not good for first person games.

It doesn't matter, bring this out on the xboxlive arcade.
and on wii too.

it IS NOT difficult, technically i mean.

[Bek]

Is that based on your experience with HPL2 or...? I'm fine with ports after, as long as PC stays the main focus I guess.

[Deu sex]

(10-09-2010 11:35 AM)Bek Wrote:  Is that based on your experience with HPL2 or...? I'm fine with ports after, as long as PC stays the main focus I guess.

agreed, and its not about my knowledges on the hpl2 engine, im just a beginner on 3D programming, but its about my knowledges in general, the game is technically light, so it is absolutely not a problem to port it on xbox 360 (xboxlive) because the engine of the 360 is near of a pc engine (due to microsoft, same factory)
and on wii, they'll just have to lower graphics a little bit.

for the else, its just about engine optimisation, little code changes, and joystic adaptations.

and marketing ... XD

[Mjarr]

There is one problem with the movement: how do you make ACCURATE and PRECISE turns when you're running away? Making the analog stick oversensitive is not a good idea while keeping it as it usually is on console the time it takes to turn around takes too long and you'll be new kebabdish in a nanosecond, and adding 90\180 degree instaturn buttons would make the whole control scheme a huge mess or feel like you're controlling sockpuppet, or a remote control robot.

Imagine this:

Spoiler below!

The chase scene involving the water monster early in the game. How silly it would feel that run forward, use 90 degree turn button, run forward, use 90 degree turn button, fun forward, use 180 degree turn button, turn yourself to the right 30 degrees slowly as hell due pad acceleration (and making it faster just makes it very oversensitive), grab the door, slam it shut, press 180 degree turn, run forward and repeat. It's just really robotic.

Another example would be the sewers when you see the brute smashing through those pipes and chasing you. Almost every sequence that potentially requires fast turns and precision with them would be just problematic without major redesign to be 'console safe', and most often that would defeat the purpose and to be mean about it, a huge cockslap in the face regarding certain immersive parts

And don't forget the console FoV issue.

[martinstatic]

Movement is no problem imo...look at Call Of Duty, almost every Youtube video of that game is on 360. Analog stick movements are fine, there's no problem really, almost everyone is used to them by now.
As for turning around quick, it'd just use acceleration like most FPS'. You know, you move the analog stick in a certain direction for a second and it speeds up.

As for your example on using a 90 degree button...why have a 90 degree button?!?! Anyone, a small child can turn 90 degrees on an xbox with ease.
This being said, the PC version would still offer the most accurate and immersive experience..