Opinions on how TCR & FG are dealing with AAMFP criticism

[Lazarus]

It does prove that AMFP is not as well regarded overall, I'm not one to use argumentum ad populum, but the evidence does stand to show that at the very least.

Perhaps, if you restrict yourself to just going by MetaCritic; there are far more professional reviews online than those listed on MetaCritic.

These are the scores currently listed in the Info Portal. I suck a maths so if someone could figure out what the mean score would be from all of these that would at least provide a more complete picture of the situation.

One of the reviews gave it an A and another gave it a B+, so I'm not sure how that would translate into a percentage haha.

I used horizontal rules to divide the scores into blocks of 10.

Spoiler below!

8.7/10
8/10
7.5/10
3.7/10
4/5
6/10
6.6/10
9/10
8/10
9/10

---

8.5/10
8/10
3/5
3.5/5
7/10
5.6/10
7/10
7.2/10
7/10
7/10

---

3/5
3.5/5
7/10
7/10
6.75/10
3/5
7/10
5/10
7/10
9/10

---

5/10
7.75/10
4/5
8/10
2.5/5
7.2/10
3/5
8.5/10
7/10
7.5/10

---

8/10
8/10
4.5/5
8/10
7.4/10
8.1/10
8/10
2.5/5
7/10
7/10

---

3.5/10
8.7/10
8.3/10
7.5/10
9.7/10
3.5/5
3.5/5
8/10
8/10
6/10

---

4/5
9.1/10
4/7
7/10
6.7/10
9/10
4.38/5
4/5
9/10
8.9/10

---

7/10
7.5/10
4/5
8/10
8/10
4/5
5/10
8/10
8.5/10
10/10

---

7.5/10
4.5/5
8/10
6/10
5/5
7.25/10
8/10
8.5/10
4.5/5
6.5/10

Those numbers are from 90 different reviews, there are many more which don't provide "scores".

7.3/10 I believe that is a C.
the fact that there is 90 is a wrong way of looking at that though because you have denominators of 5.