Facebook Twitter YouTube Frictional Games | Forum | Privacy Policy | Dev Blog | Dev Wiki | Support | Gametee


Thread Rating:
  • 16 Vote(s) - 2.25 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Opinions on how TCR & FG are dealing with AAMFP criticism
Froge Offline
Posting Freak

Posts: 2,955
Threads: 176
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation: 125
RE: Opinions on how TCR & FG are dealing with AAMFP criticism

(10-19-2013, 04:20 AM)Damascus Rose Wrote: Edit: and wow, what the FUCK is that blog/interview paddy linked.. I have never seen such ridiculous ass-kissing like that in one of those interviews. "The developers' deep intelligence about how stories can manipulate the mind
,"A Machine for Pigs provides a lasting imprint on players that somehow is more psychologically manipulative","Curry and Pinchbeck seem sharply intellectual".. what the hell. And whoever wrote this does not seem to even understand what amnesia TDD is about. "That game was popular for its jump-scare qualities, its ability to frighten in small intense doses, to elicit squeals from players and the makers of online Let's Play videos." What the actual fuck, that sounds like a description of outlast. Sure TDD had jumpscares and frigtened in small doses, but it was all about slow grinding psychological horror. And about amfp: "This new kind of horror hasn't leant itself to the YouTubers who flourished on the drama of publishing video of The Dark Descent's jump scares." No... there isn't any different horror in pigs. There's just less of it. And it obviously relies more on jumpscares to scare you. This is just disgusting to read.. so fucking pompous and pretentious..
Probably one of those arthouse gamers who fervently support indie companies because they're s0d33p.

[Image: p229xcq]
10-19-2013, 06:11 PM
Find


Messages In This Thread
RE: Opinions on how TCR & FG are dealing with AAMFP criticism - by Froge - 10-19-2013, 06:11 PM



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)