Frictional Games Forum (read-only)

Full Version: The Ultimate SOMA Discussion Thread
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438
Does anyone else think the monster
Spoiler below!

looks just like a modified grunt with a flashing blue helmet?

(04-07-2014, 11:18 PM)pagan Wrote: [ -> ][...]but i'm afraid we, who were disappointed, are the majority, unfortunately.[...]
"Majority" likes Twilight too. Is the hint is clear enough or are we going to continue stating our subjective opinions as an objective fact and keep projecting?
(04-08-2014, 03:41 AM)Damascus Rose Wrote: [ -> ]Does anyone else think the monster
Spoiler below!

looks just like a modified grunt with a flashing blue helmet?


Could be a placeholder.
(04-08-2014, 11:42 AM)SomethingRidiculous Wrote: [ -> ]Could be a placeholder.

That's what I though as well. And yes it does look like a grunt.

There's no point in adding spoiler tags, the game is not out yet and those articles, videos are available to everyone. If someone doesn't want absolutely anything known before hand why would he/she check this topic?
So, I'm getting the whole "mysteriously you're the only survivor in an abandoned power plant making contact years after it went offline, and we find out later that YOU'RE the monster" vibe here.

I hope I'm wrong. I wasn't wrong about AMFP, I really hope this game surprises me.
(04-08-2014, 03:07 AM)Delirium92 Wrote: [ -> ]If you're so concerned about realism perhaps you should just stop playing video games and go outside.

Boy, the games I like have a touch of realism. And I'm not just speaking about racing games! A good game should be almost believable to be worth playing. I'm not meaning games like Super Mario or other mini-games here that are for fun.
(04-08-2014, 04:04 PM)Googolplex Wrote: [ -> ]Boy, the games I like have a touch of realism. And I'm not just speaking about racing games! A good game should be almost believable to be worth playing. I'm not meaning games like Super Mario or other mini-games here that are for fun.
Sometimes you have to mix unrealistic things with suspension of disbelief to get the most enjoyment out of something. Sometimes being realistic without mixing it up can be incredibly boring.
(04-08-2014, 07:14 PM)Kreekakon Wrote: [ -> ]Sometimes you have to mix unrealistic things with suspension of disbelief to get the most enjoyment out of something. Sometimes being realistic without mixing it up can be incredibly boring.

Of course. When I mean a realistic RPG, I do not mean a medieval-simulator. I mean a fantasy game but with a credible concept of design.

I just wondered, because Thomas said everything in SOMA should make sense and then I see this! I'm not disappointed when all this things happening, but I just can't believe his words and I would more love it to avoid things that are "magic".
(04-08-2014, 07:32 PM)Googolplex Wrote: [ -> ]I just wondered, because Thomas said everything in SOMA should make sense and then I see this! I'm not disappointed when all this things happening, but I just can't believe his words and I would more love it to avoid things that are "magic".

It's another year until the release, they're not going to start explaining and spoiling every little bit at this point ...
(04-08-2014, 12:49 PM)plutomaniac Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-08-2014, 11:42 AM)SomethingRidiculous Wrote: [ -> ]Could be a placeholder.

That's what I though as well. And yes it does look like a grunt.

There's no point in adding spoiler tags, the game is not out yet and those articles, videos are available to everyone. If someone doesn't want absolutely anything known before hand why would he/she check this topic?

I added them because maybe someone wanted to see updates on the game (interviews, videos) and didn't want possible monster spoilers. No harm in adding spoiler tags anyway so might as well.


(04-08-2014, 10:59 AM)Kein Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-07-2014, 11:18 PM)pagan Wrote: [ -> ][...]but i'm afraid we, who were disappointed, are the majority, unfortunately.[...]
"Majority" likes Twilight too. Is the hint is clear enough or are we going to continue stating our subjective opinions as an objective fact and keep projecting?

The majority of people actually hate Twilight. And from my experience, the majority was disappointed by amfp. Every single one of my friends who played TDD was disappointed, almost every comment I read on youtube or interview pages about amfp or soma reference their disappointment with amfp, or just look at some reviews/metacritic. They all rate it lower than TDD. There's a few people that quite liked amfp but it's clear to me that they are minority.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438