+- Frictional Games Forum (read-only) (https://www.frictionalgames.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Frictional Games (https://www.frictionalgames.com/forum/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Off-Topic (https://www.frictionalgames.com/forum/forum-16.html)
+--- Thread: Time? (/thread-18513.html)
RE: Time? - Prelauncher - 09-26-2012
I came up with a thought when you guys were discussing what "present" is. We as humans never experience the present, that tiny bit of time (if it even exist) that is NOW. Our bodies are exposed to it but our minds will never register it. This is because it takes time for the brain to be reached by the impressions around our bodies and it takes time for it to register it. So in a way we all live in the past, and all that we see, feel, hear etc. has already happened.
These types of topics are really exciting, there are no roght or wrong answers, only the plausible. We've just reached fields in fysics in school that scientists don't have any explanation for. For example, electrons behave like particles and waves at the same time depending on if they are being observed. It's like they know someone is observing and therefore behave in a different way, but how can something like an electron be aware of anything and change its behaviour?
RE: Time? - Yuhaney - 09-26-2012
(09-26-2012, 06:22 PM)Prelauncher Wrote: So in a way we all live in the past, and all that we see, feel, hear etc. has already happened.
Déjà vu?
RE: Time? - Acies - 09-26-2012
On the topic of time:
RE: Time? - Khyrpa - 09-26-2012
(09-26-2012, 06:22 PM)Prelauncher Wrote: I came up with a thought when you guys were discussing what "present" is. We as humans never experience the present, that tiny bit of time (if it even exist) that is NOW. Our bodies are exposed to it but our minds will never register it. This is because it takes time for the brain to be reached by the impressions around our bodies and it takes time for it to register it. So in a way we all live in the past, and all that we see, feel, hear etc. has already happened."Like they know someone is observing". To be able to "see" them, we have to use something so we actually can (eg. light and eyes). I've not studied quantum physics much, but I've always found how that test is told to people pretty dumb.
These types of topics are really exciting, there are no roght or wrong answers, only the plausible. We've just reached fields in fysics in school that scientists don't have any explanation for. For example, electrons behave like particles and waves at the same time depending on if they are being observed. It's like they know someone is observing and therefore behave in a different way, but how can something like an electron be aware of anything and change its behaviour?
RE: Time? - Prelauncher - 09-26-2012
(09-26-2012, 06:41 PM)Khyrpa Wrote:Yes, of course, I should have been more clear: We don't actually watch the electrons. By observing I mean that their movement "behaviour" are being measured and studied. But that description is a very easy way (yes, dumbed down to a great deal) to break it down when explaining it.(09-26-2012, 06:22 PM)Prelauncher Wrote:"Like they know someone is observing". To be able to "see" them, we have to use something so we actually can (eg. light and eyes). I've not studied quantum physics much, but I've always found how that test is told to people pretty dumb.
RE: Time? - Robby - 09-26-2012
What I'd miss? Been livestreaming the past hour.
RE: Time? - Prelauncher - 09-26-2012
(09-26-2012, 06:57 PM)Nemet Robert Wrote: What I'd miss? Been livestreaming the past hour.Based of the discussions in this thread: Was it really an hour O.O
RE: Time? - Robby - 09-26-2012
Almost.
RE: Time? - Yuhaney - 09-26-2012
It's past. Yes.
Oh wait... It's future now.
RE: Time? - Robby - 09-26-2012
(09-26-2012, 07:09 PM)Scraper Wrote: It's past. Yes.Decide. Future or past?
Oh wait... It's future now.
Confusion is 9999 right now. At least my mind was freshened before, thanks to the livestream I did.