Sexuality

[Kman]

No matter what you think, but this is simply wrong. You can have sex with the opposite gender and still be homosexual. You can't alter your sexuality, therefore it's not a choice. It's simple as that.

If sexuality would be a choice, how could anyone choose to be a homosexual, with all the biases, discrimination and problems in social life?

Would you allow choice to be limited only in the person, animal or object that the sexual act is directed to? If you question my inclusion of animals and objects, then you should likewise question your belief of being born a certain way. For if a person be labelled with a sexuality before ever committing an act towards said sexuality, wouldn't it be likewise right to declare that a person was born a sex toy addict or with beastiality? Would considering this not direct one towards the idea that the only thing natural within a person's sexuality is only their desire to self pleasure, regardless of the method chosen to satisfy? For if attraction were not nuture but nature, you could not deny anyone any form of sexuality; afterall, they were "born with it."

Even if sexuality were a choice, who are we to deny an individual this choice?

"We" are those who would likewise deny people choices other than homosexuality and prove to be in the right in doing so. Yet, when people choose to deny others homosexuality it shouldn't be taken within the same context as denying others different, so-called choices?

Beastiality and homosexuality are two different things, and I really don't see how you can compare them. Yes, someone could be born really fucked up and for some reason want to bone a horse, same goes for someone being born homosexual. The difference is though that a guy finds another guy that he loves, there's a chance that that person would love them back. In that situation both members of the party would be ok with it, and would both want to partake in said sex. Now if you drive out to the nearest farm, find some horse and... well, do things to it, it does not have any affection for you, and I'm sure it wouldn't want to partake in whatever you're doing to it. Not only that, but it can damage the animal physically (depending on the size of the animal and what not), making it animal abuse. The most that could happen in two men having anal sex is one of them getting an STD, and in that case it would be their fault since they wanted and were ok with doing something that could potentially lead to getting such diseases. Those two choices are different, when someone takes part in beastiality the only purpose it serves is to get pleasure, but with homosexuality there is actually room for a more intimate feelings.


GOD that was awkward to write.