Sexuality

[spukrian]

Would you allow choice to be limited only in the person, animal or object that the sexual act is directed to? If you question my inclusion of animals and objects, then you should likewise question your belief of being born a certain way. For if a person be labelled with a sexuality before ever committing an act towards said sexuality, wouldn't it be likewise right to declare that a person was born a sex toy addict or with beastiality? Would considering this not direct one towards the idea that the only thing natural within a person's sexuality is only their desire to self pleasure, regardless of the method chosen to satisfy? For if attraction were not nuture but nature, you could not deny anyone any form of sexuality; afterall, they were "born with it."

If a person is attracted to animals, then he/she is a "zoophile". And that's not illegal. He/she only becomes a criminal when he/she abuses animals.

Basically, the zoophile CANNOT choose his/her sexuality, but he/she can choose to NOT commit crimes. So to answer your question, YES, we can't deny anyone any form of sexuality.

"We" are those who would likewise deny people choices other than homosexuality and prove to be in the right in doing so. Yet, when people choose to deny others homosexuality it shouldn't be taken within the same context as denying others different, so-called choices?

If homosexuality really was a choice, then it should NOT be denied, because two homosexuals having consensual sex are NOT hurting anyone.

After all religion is a choice, should "we" deny people the right to choose what to believe in?