Sexuality

[Your Computer]

So being heterosexual could be a mental disorder? because hetero and homosexuality is essentially the same thing.

In terms of possibility, it could be. In terms of plausibility, it is unlikely. But my main concern is on the reasoning behind why homosexuality is being accepted today.

My original statement was "some babies grow up to be homosexual adults and this is not their own choice". It's NOT my problem if you deliberately misinterpret what I write.

"Growing up" takes time, therefore implying nurture, therefore implying choice. I did not misinterpret; it is simply that you are assuming a definition of "growing up" that doesn't imply choice, therefore claiming "it is not there choice." However, this is circular reasoning. I do not accept circular reasoning as logical truth or as deductive logic. As far as i understand, English is read from left to right; to say it is the other way around is reading your statement from right to left.

My point, which you missed, is that left handed people DO NOT CHOOSE to be left handed. It has nothing to do with skill.

How did i miss your point when i started my argument with: "Your correlation between being left-handed and being gay is being born with it"? And being whatever-handed a person is does have to do with skill, because no one person uses only one hand for every form of hand labour. They may be "left-handed" in some things, but "right-handed" in others (note the quotations). Just because someone does an act better with a certain hand than the other doesn't in itself mean that such an act can only be performed by that one hand (assuming there are no injuries or deformities to either hand). In the same way, i argue just because a person is homosexual or heterosexual doesn't mean they are only capable of that one sexuality.

...but this quote just shows your flawed worldview.

Whether such a statement is full of flaws i do not know. I did see potential conflict when writing it, but i personally overcame those conflicts and therefore permitted such a statement. You, however, didn't take the time to point these flaws out. The potential conflict which i saw from my own statement depends solely on the word "criteria," as it would appear that your assumption on the methods of judgement used for sexuality can be generalised for all forms of sexuality, at least concerning homosexuality vs heterosexuality, regardless of these two words being mutually exclusive by definition. I don't see how mutual exclusivity can be generalised without exceptions or specifics (which would show that such a generalisation may be an illusion of generalisation).

Here's a scientific study on homosexuality in men, I hope this is good enough.

I will read it thoroughly and respond to it at a later time.