Sexuality

[Your Computer]

And you base this on what scientific study?

Are the definition of words solely dependent on scientific study? Or are words generally a reference of reality? If mankind wanted to, "green" could have represented a different color (or anything at all) and we would have continued that without conflict.

And what would you define a "homosexual act" because they are exactly (notice, EXACTLY, 100%, no nothin' bull, on point) exactly, the, same, as, heterosexual, acts. There. is. no. difference. between. a. homosexual. and. a. heterosexual. person. It's the same thing. Same feelings, same arousal, same everything.

If there wasn't any difference on any scale, would i be able to further define a "homosexual act" as sexual intercourse between at least two men with no women or between at least two women with no men?

Do I need to spell that out again?

No, i am more than content in the fact that you stated such an argument. (See your quote below as to why.)

I have been thinking some more about this and you know what? This argument is flawed to the bone because that would imply that being a serial killer could be okay (or should I say is okay) but isn't because we have told ourselves that it isn't. That's such a fluid and loose way of thinking that i'm not even sure that I would call that a valid "opinion". Also, based on what you said that heterosexuality _could_ be a mental disorder, you are implying that every little animal, every organism and microorganism on this earth could be mentaly disrupted? c'mon man, you must be trolling the lot of us because that's just silly.

Of course, to assume that you see any correlation between this quote of yours and your previous quote should (would) be wishful thinking on my side. Assume reference to other kinds of sexualities, then you may see it.

As i've mentioned before, morality is an illusion without an absolute authority. In a world without an absolute authority, majority would be the only thing capable of sustaining "morality." Of course, if an absolute authority existed and majority sustained "morality" against this absolute authority, then the sustainability of such "morality" would itself be an illusion. For at any time such illusion of sustainability could be overruled by the absolute authority.

Your Computer. try to understand this. Sexuality is not a choice. did you choose to be straight? (assuming that you are.)

no. looking at girls simple gives you a boner. the same thing goes whit gays (but whit the same gender). why does everything must seem like a choice to people? you don't have a choice you simple are. its like being human. you didn't choose to be human either.

True, i didn't choose to be human, but i did choose to be a heterosexual. Sexual stimuli is neutral. Through nurture my sexual dominance became heterosexuality. Simply looking at girls is not itself a sexual stimuli (at least for me). Greater motivation is required for sexual stimuli to occur.

---

Note to spukrian: I am almost done consuming the referenced scientific article.