(08-02-2013, 10:52 AM)Dogfood Wrote: [ -> ] (08-02-2013, 03:55 AM)Statyk Wrote: [ -> ]It's not about the content at this point, it's that you keep putting it up after I don't want it on there.
It's amazing how shit hits the fan when a god damn mod does their job on this forum considering the lack of rules.
so at this point, he's not breaking any rules at all but you still throw him warnings just because you dont like his signature?
Again, it's not because of the content at this point. It's because he put it on for the
third time I've had to remove it. It's more of arrogance I'm giving the warning for. And the rules are basically just common sense and being courteous at the moment. His temp ban is only set for a day. He'll be free to talk later. Warnings usually always temp ban people for a day, but it never usually puts a strike through the name and changes their title.
But yeah, nothing big, just getting a bit annoyed.
I'm guessing the signature was highly pornographic
No, it was just inappropriate. Can we drop this now?
(08-02-2013, 07:39 PM)Statyk Wrote: [ -> ]No, it was just inappropriate. Can we drop this now?
LEAVE STAYK ALONE
EDIT - Fixed link. Original link to the Crocker video was taken down. Or broken at a minimum.
(08-02-2013, 01:58 PM)Robosprog Wrote: [ -> ] (08-02-2013, 03:28 AM)failedALIAS Wrote: [ -> ] (08-02-2013, 03:24 AM)Danny Boy Wrote: [ -> ]There's this thing called a "condom" you know?
Let me explain this YET AGAIN: I don't want to have sex; I find sex stupid; sex can off itself for all I care. And because I find the idea of sex repulsive AND don't want children, then I will gladly NEVER DO IT!
.. Yeeah, no.
Unless you are completely devoid of sexual desire which is highly unlikely. Incredibly so.
Chances are, you just like to act as if it is beneathj you, a menial, pointless task - which it is not, it is crucial to the survival of our species - and thusly appear to those who are taken by the urge as someone with great willpower and control.
Trust me, that reaallly isn't the case on the internet mate. Unless you can link to the condition you have that causes this, I'll say that you're not being truthful.
well i mean he could just be asexual
False alarm. wubwub is sorry it seems and decided to return it after some long hard thought.
(08-02-2013, 11:57 PM)Robosprog Wrote: [ -> ]Which is highly unlikely as I said.
It's always the same thing. I can never say what I actually think and feel without somebody thinking I'm being High and Mighty.
Also, I understand the PURPOSE. I respect and admire people who have children. Good for them! I just don't like it myself.
Well, ALIAS, I understand that you're very different from everyone else.
(08-03-2013, 03:09 AM)Chronocat Wrote: [ -> ]Well, ALIAS, I understand that you're very different from everyone else.
This coming from the guy (cat?) that excuses not reading classics 'cause they're "too mainstream"? Or is that just another one of your attempts at humor?
Anyone else really excited for Maniac?